What in the Hell Are They Thinking

By Aaron Cantor ~ October 25th, 2012 @ 04:51

By

Aaron Cantor USAF (ret)

 

 

I received this in the mail, and now that I am out of sickbay and back on my feet, I am passing it on along with a reprint of a previous column of mine.

Is it just me, or do you also get the impression that the political elites think that if the bad guys take over our country, they will be immune from any retribution and will be able to continue in their comfortable chairs of power and privilege?

If the country falls, they will be the first ones to face a firing squad, then, we would be next, especially anyone who has had military training, and/or who is a registered gun owner.

 

 

 

 

From: Mike Stueck

Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 12:09 PM

Subject: FW: Is Civil War coming?

 

I have been getting info on this for quite a while now & thinking that it was just reactionary. Now I have seen interviews with people in Washington who are now talking about this latest turn & quite clearly stating that Hillary is doing everything possible to make it happen. – Mike

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the
U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush’s administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms.

The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth?

Obama and the truth have never met.
He is the most consummate liar there is.

What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

This is neither a joke nor a false warning. As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.

Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is
headed.

We are being led like a lamb to the slaughter (Socialism/Dictatorship).
DON’T KEEP THIS – SEND IT OUT TO YOUR LIST

 

 

Shall Not Be Abridged

By

Aaron Cantor

 

The 2nd Amendment

A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, SHALL NOT Be INFRINGED

I don’t know what part of that Hillary Clinton and those goons at the U.N. don’t understand.

Admiral Yamamoto wisely told his Emperor prior to WW11 that invading the American homeland would not be a wise idea, as they would find an American gun behind every blade of grass.

The following has been posted and re-posted several times by several different people and since Hillary Machashaifeh (Yiddish for witch) Clinton is trying to do an end run around the 2nd Amendment at the U.N. it certainly does no harm to ring the alarm bell again.

 

The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.

The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army.

The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.

The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.

The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion).

These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.

Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, “the Organized Militia (the National Guard) cannot be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States.”

The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.

If it is not spelled out in the Constitution (enumerated powers) it is not authorized and nowhere in the 2nd Amendment does it mention any restriction on what type or caliber of weapon a citizen may own or how many, nor does it say anything about magazine capacity, or type of ammunition you may possess or what quantity, and that being said what all these supposed restrictions is simply politicians trying to blow smoke up your Kilt because politicians don’t like armed citizens it makes them nervous as hell.

The Militia Act and the revised Militia Act (the Dick Act), make it quite clear that all men between the ages of 18 and 45 are the (unorganized) militia with an absolute right to keep and bear Arms under the Article II of the Bill of Rights, of whatever type; automatic or semi-automatic, regardless of size, magazine capacity, barrel length or caliber/gauge in any quantity they may deem necessary along with any amount of ammunition they may determine from time to time.

 

Without the spelled out authorization to do so you goons in the House and Senate cannot change the 2nd Amendment in any way, shape or form, nor can the U.N. put any restrictions on our bill of rights.

What the hell diploma mill did you idiots get your law degree from?

“The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Report”, of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the United States Senate Judiciary Committee; Ninety-seventh Congress, second session, February 1982. Orrin Hatch, Chairman.
“That the National Guard is not the “Militia” referred to in the Second Amendment is even clearer today. Congress has organized the National Guard under its power to “raise and support armies”, and not its power to “Provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia.” This Congress chose to do so in the interest of organizing reserve military units which were not limited in deployment by the strictures of our power over Constitutional militia, which can be called forth only “to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrection, and repel invasions.” The modern National Guard was specifically intended to avoid status as the Constitutional militia, a distinction recognized by Title 10 United States Code 311 (a).”

“The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commenter and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner.”

The Second Amendment right to keep and bear Arms, therefore, is a right of the individual citizen to privately possess and carry in a peaceful manner firearms and similar arms. Such an individual rights interpretation is in full accord with the history of the right to keep and bear arms previously discussed…It accurately reflects the majority of proposals that lead up to the Bill of Rights itself.

NOW, THEREFORE, all existing or future so-called “gun and/or ammunition laws”, of whatever name or form under “color of law”, whether Federal, Federal Agency, Pseudo Federal Agency, State, County or Municipal that infringes, abridges or restricts in any manner, the God given, unalienable, indefeasible, Constitutional right of Citizens to keep and bear Arms peaceably, openly or concealed, for their defense of life, liberty, and property are prima facie violations of Article 1, Sec. 9, Part 3; Article 6, Part 2; and Amendments I, II, IV, IX, and X of the Constitution for the United States of America; Article 2; Sec. 1, Sec. 2, Sec. 4, Sec. 5, Sec. 27, and Sec. 29 of the Constitution for the State of Arkansas; and the Dick Act of 1902, and are NO LAW, ab initio, ultra vires, of no force and effect, incumbent upon no one to obey or any court to enforce.

__________________

 

I just had a thought , maybe the reason Hillary is trying so damned hard to disarm us is she doesn’t want someone deflating her fat butt with a bullet when she attempts to run for president in 2016, AND MAKE NO MISTAKE SHE INTENDS TO RUN!

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

http://www.eyesonwashington.com

READER COMMENTS/FEEDBACK PLEASE

PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL ON YOUR LIST

REQUEST THAT THEY DO THE SAME PLEASE

 

FacebookEmailTwitterShare
RSSSubscribe to blog feed.

Leave a Reply

Comment RSS  |  Trackback URI


©2007-2013 Eyes on Washington.com | powered by WordPress | Theme Design:Fat Cat Designs | Log in